acronym STEMM has S & E in it as separate entities for a reason in that they do qualitatively different things.
-
-
I guess 1 way to see what we think: Do you consider what they do here rev eng or sci? Or both? https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.01644v1 …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @synapticlee
I am not familiar with the field, and I only skimmed it, but the subject appears to be a branch of Graph Theory.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drjtwit @synapticlee
OK well, regardless of what you think it is, it's addressing/attempting to address the issue in the nature article.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
& it's what I think also is a relatively useful way of examining scientifically the high-level/theory-level of (D)NNs.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
So much work needs to be done to understand and not use brute force what these complex systems actually do.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
And my point previously = scientific inquiry and not rev eng (since we know the low-level anyway) is what's required.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
And this general topic of how and why we need to understand (D)NNs is what my PhD was on.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Also that day I had a migraine so it's likely that was affecting the comms as chronic pain does bad things to me.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I'll shut up on this issue for good though as I'm aware you're likely not as interested/invested as I.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Also it's my first day working at my new job at UCL so I should be off Twitter even though no desk yet – haha.
-
-
have yet to read the paper but agree with your thoughts. ooh new job! Where in ucl??
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 9 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.