we've published a paper mostly dealing with replication https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.00181
-
-
-
Replying to @o_guest
Cohen, N. & Pasechnik, D.V. Des. Codes Cryptogr. (2016). doi:10.1007/s10623-016-0264-x
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @o_guest
http://wstein.org/papers/talks/2016-06-sage-bp/bp.pdf … is a good story to see how things are in my field wrt software.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dimpase
why do these slides ring a bell...
@drvinceknight have you spoken to me about this?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @drvinceknight
indeed, Vince could very well have mentioned this.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @dimpase @drvinceknight
To be clear, I do have a compsci degree so I'm not completely removed from the definition of replication you use.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
But it's dramatically different to what we do in comp cog neurosci modelling.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
And turbo different to cogsci/psych of course. The replication crisis is about QRMs, p-hacking, lack of theory, etc.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Notwithstanding this is of course interesting and thanks for sharing.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.