even one person's data is another anecdote and vice versa – this is literally where philosophy/belief comes in!
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @richarddmorey
but when a boxer goes jogging to stay in shape we don't call it boxing, even though it helps them box better.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Ugnudabul @richarddmorey
what? I get this is sophistry but no idea to what end.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @richarddmorey
scientists can engage in philosophy and faith to help them do more science. But should we call it science?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Ugnudabul @richarddmorey
No, we never said that. Philosophy is what drives the scientific method(s), *by definition* it's not science.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
To wit, the scientific method that you choose to use, e.g., Popperianism, is a philosophy.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @richarddmorey
Fine. Maybe I'm just a kid who doesn't want the green beans and the mashed potatoes to be touching on my plate.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Ugnudabul @richarddmorey
I didn't realise you were a child. Be safe.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @richarddmorey
No, no, I'm not
. Just trying to say that I don't like my science and my philosophy to be touching.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Ugnudabul @richarddmorey
alright, I don't know where/if you publish, but they are constantly touching. By definition. It's not about want.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I don't mean to be rude but it's genuinely reached the stage where it's pointless to continue. Sorry.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.