so you think a "good" (wtv this means) comp cog journal would more likely've pubed it than in current state of affairs?
a baseline journal to publish to if things go badly or whatever. I never intended to just replicate btw.
-
-
PS: thanks, this has actually been one of the most fruitful and informative discussion I have had on Twitter in ages.
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
In the absence of comp journals offering RRs (none yet), RSOS may be a good choice. http://rsos.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/registered-reports …
-
oh cheers for link! Is RRR a strict subset of RR?
-
Yeah, so the acronym RRR is usually reserved for a Registered Report option that is *only* offered for replications, >
-
> such as at Perspectives on Psychological Science or Cognition & Emotion, whereas RR refers to Registered Reports more >
-
> broadly, which in almost all cases is offered for both replications & original studies. We curate a list of journals &>
-
> specific policies here: https://osf.io/8mpji/wiki/2.%20Journal%20Comparison/?_ga=1.76143125.121950508.1455488325 … See columns 4 & 5 for wheth RRs are offered for only reps (i.e. RRRs) >
-
> or wheth they are offered for both (RRs). And occasionally, some journals only accept RRs for orig studies (not reps).
-
Very useful – thanks!
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

