/writing up
-
-
Yes, definitely, provided they have a Registered Reports submission option. V hard to pub reps as conventional articles >
-
> bc if rep succeeds then reviewers who *aren't* one of the original authors will likely say "so what" (as will eds) >
-
> & if rep fails then motivated reasoning from reviewers who *are* one of the orig auths will ensure they find some >
-
> "critical flaw" or deviation from the orig protocol to explain non-rep. In either, case, chance of rejection very high.
-
OK, so that means if I ever do a comp replication (or other type) again I should seek out such a journal as it provides
-
a baseline journal to publish to if things go badly or whatever. I never intended to just replicate btw.
-
PS: thanks, this has actually been one of the most fruitful and informative discussion I have had on Twitter in ages.
-
You're most welcome. Was totally worth it for "pubed" alone. Brilliant.
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

