gathering data or writing up? 
-
-
-
Replying to @PaulEDux
same here but going through reviews and rewrites on my own. Although rejected, I feel like I shouldn't give up yet, not sure tho.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Keep trying & my advice for the future: always submit replication studies as a Registered Report. Makes life much easier!
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @chrisdc77 @PaulEDux
even for computational modelling? I guess you are telling me that in any case it makes work more publication worthy?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Oh yes, def for comp modelling. Works for any discipline, & imo it's not so much that RRs are more pub worthy but that >
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
> by obtaining provisional acceptance in advance, you avoid risk of rep study being rejected based on the results.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @chrisdc77 @PaulEDux
so you think a "good" (wtv this means) comp cog journal would more likely've pubed it than in current state of affairs?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
LOL at "pubed it". That would certainly be an...interesting...journal policy. (Sorry tho, don't quite follow your Q)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
ok so my question is counterfactual: in your opinion, do you think that a journal would more likely have pub(lish)ed 
-
-
it all else being equal if I had RRRed it?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 16 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
