How many people have published/are trying to publish replications? Please RT – I'm curious given the interest. Me: two, strictly speaking.
so you think a "good" (wtv this means) comp cog journal would more likely've pubed it than in current state of affairs?
-
-
LOL at "pubed it". That would certainly be an...interesting...journal policy. (Sorry tho, don't quite follow your Q)
-
hahaha didn't even notice I did that

-
ok so my question is counterfactual: in your opinion, do you think that a journal would more likely have pub(lish)ed

-
it all else being equal if I had RRRed it?
-
Yes, definitely, provided they have a Registered Reports submission option. V hard to pub reps as conventional articles >
-
> bc if rep succeeds then reviewers who *aren't* one of the original authors will likely say "so what" (as will eds) >
-
> & if rep fails then motivated reasoning from reviewers who *are* one of the orig auths will ensure they find some >
-
> "critical flaw" or deviation from the orig protocol to explain non-rep. In either, case, chance of rejection very high.
- 12 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
