section it's down to bad writing. That's my position.
not convinced. I actually wrote a paper on exactly why that's the worst idea
-
-
with a co author who's very thoughtful with respect to this and not on twitter the short version is that code can't be in
-
lieu of specification for a model or a theory because code is not the central scientific thing being discussed the model
-
is so that must be specified in the paper.
-
I would hate to be in a field where reviews didn't understand the methods and had to glance at code or even run it just to
-
understand the big picture.
-
that being said I'm all for open code and running of code which is what we do at
@ReScienceEds
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.