I sure hope I am considered a peer by my students.
-
-
Replying to @shravanvasishth @deevybee
I guess it's up to you. But surely marking ≠ peer review?
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @shravanvasishth
My post is not so much about the writing (tho often poor) but about incomprehensible methods
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @deevybee @shravanvasishth
you mean the methods are incomprehensible regardless of good writing?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @deevybee @shravanvasishth
I thought I did. Perhaps it's caffeine that's missing.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @shravanvasishth
Sorry! I suspect my writing was not very clear! But my concern is really about intersection of complex disciplines
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @deevybee @shravanvasishth
no problem and I think I'm actually just from a field that's extremely interdisciplinary comp neuro cog psy and I
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
genuinely think people don't know not to convey methods well. But! I take your point that many are convoluted.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
*not = how
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I think it is a property of interdisciplinary areas. For example, preprints in my area can be gobbledegook.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.