If authors admit having used p-hacking/QRPs which invalidate conclusions of a published study, what should happen to the article?
you think the institution which probably hired her off the back of TED talk and other fame will reevaluate her?
-
-
Not making a prediction in this specific case, but in general it's a possibility that concerns high-ranking ppl more.
-
high ranking ppl have their elitist old boy/girl networks to fall back on, loads of privilege there

-
1) I think coming clean about shady methods that also earned your elitist friends their jobs can result in a sig fall >
-
> from grace. 2) I'm not arguing top-end folks are to be pitied or worse off. Just saying relationship b/w rank and >
-
> transparency cost won't be so straightforward in every case.
-
don't know... Never been a prof at an elite US uni, but seems to have great machiavellian potential if you ask me!
-
in all seriousness though this should be about the lit and what we as a sci want to do about it. If nothing then
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Cuddy did the TED talk, not Carney.
-
still loads of leverage & prestige imho
-
I'm sure the hiring committee based some of their decision on this
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If Carney's re-evaluated, she should earn a promotion for scientific courage.
-
I just don't get it
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.