If authors admit having used p-hacking/QRPs which invalidate conclusions of a published study, what should happen to the article?
is is really courage when you are powerful and covering your ass though? Like this seems way more like spin to me.
-
-
It was going to come out sooner or later.
-
Do you really think that? I believe there are just enough Fiskes out there for a happily-ever-after without ever >
-
> having to admit any sort of wrongdoing. Alternative: Say you lost faith in effect but only refer to sampling error.
-
I think it’s definitely more courageous the farther down the hierarchy you go.
-
Yes and no. On the top end you're most responsible and might be held accountable eg. by funders&administration, no?
-
you think the institution which probably hired her off the back of TED talk and other fame will reevaluate her?
-
Not making a prediction in this specific case, but in general it's a possibility that concerns high-ranking ppl more.
-
high ranking ppl have their elitist old boy/girl networks to fall back on, loads of privilege there

- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.