But my highest level concern is with the record. We need to incentivize truth telling.
-
-
Replying to @TunnelOfFire @ecsalomon and
Yes–the record itself is the truth tho, not whether or not authors put it on their site.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @ecsalomon and
I agree. Right now retraction is a career-busting event, but I'd like the norms to change
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TunnelOfFire @o_guest and
I retracted 1 of my own in-press papers when I was in grad school based on new & better data
2 replies 2 retweets 4 likes -
-
Replying to @o_guest @ecsalomon and
My point is really that we need retractions, but need to make them less scary.
3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @TunnelOfFire @ecsalomon and
100% agreed, although I would like some people to be fired/leave too
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @ecsalomon and
For me, publishing an untrue fact is a nightmare scenario. I'd be desparate to retract it.
1 reply 2 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @TunnelOfFire @o_guest and
In science you spend your whole career publishing barely true facts :P
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sampendu @TunnelOfFire and
correcting the record should give you "bonus points"
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
so FBI informants get bonus ps while law abiding citizens get?
-
-
in my ideal writing a transparent, free of QRP paper = better journal
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.