If authors admit having used p-hacking/QRPs which invalidate conclusions of a published study, what should happen to the article?
-
-
Replying to @annemscheel
I would say retract. Some pragmatic issues: 1) not encouraging for others to also admit, and 2) need to retract loads of papers
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @Research_Tim @annemscheel
I actually have personal experience with this not just the recent twitter threads
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
people have told me to stop trying to replicate their published findings because "the methods section is wrong"
2 replies 3 retweets 1 like -
That's nuts! Wrong in omission or commission?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
bits of both
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ecsalomon @o_guest and
Ugh. Really? How do they sleep at night?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TunnelOfFire @ecsalomon and
I would assume well, like many prolific such types they are at very prestigious places
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @ecsalomon and
I agree that there is a moral hazard in reputational amnesty.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes
trust me they sleep really really well though
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.