If authors admit having used p-hacking/QRPs which invalidate conclusions of a published study, what should happen to the article?
it's not about the authors though either way. it's about having critically flawed pubs in the lit: if it's broken it must go!
-
-
I agree, I wasn't trying to make this a question about the authors but specifically about the published paper.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.