If authors admit having used p-hacking/QRPs which invalidate conclusions of a published study, what should happen to the article?
-
-
Replying to @annemscheel
I would say retract. Some pragmatic issues: 1) not encouraging for others to also admit, and 2) need to retract loads of papers
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @Research_Tim @annemscheel
I actually have personal experience with this not just the recent twitter threads
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
people have told me to stop trying to replicate their published findings because "the methods section is wrong"
2 replies 3 retweets 1 like -
so u face to face admit this at a conf with an audience & think its ok to leave as foundational pub in the lit?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
get out of science – haha
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
last tweets are facetious questions/jocular remarks but have a serious core. What's the point of pubs if not some
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
attempt at "what we think is right"
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @Research_Tim
have no evidence for this but I think most p-hackers really believe theyre right/effect is true even if methods dodgy
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
no evidence either than my own exp in labs and not sure on this point. Have seem ppl go either way for sure.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.