If authors admit having used p-hacking/QRPs which invalidate conclusions of a published study, what should happen to the article?
if not even the authors think it is ok then it's no diff to not doing science which btw is based on lots of trust
-
-
breaking trust is breaking science, bit by bit
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.