If authors admit having used p-hacking/QRPs which invalidate conclusions of a published study, what should happen to the article?
-
-
have no evidence for this but I think most p-hackers really believe theyre right/effect is true even if methods dodgy
-
no evidence either than my own exp in labs and not sure on this point. Have seem ppl go either way for sure.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
if not even the authors think it is ok then it's no diff to not doing science which btw is based on lots of trust
-
breaking trust is breaking science, bit by bit
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.