Maybe in physics if experiment had error. COPE guidelines clearly don't match with a retraction.
-
-
P-hacking and misconduct are not the same. You do 25 things wrong in your analysis you don't know about, and that is not misconduct
-
knowing if smth is wrong or not is actually not nec for misconduct. One can always claim ignorance.
@richarddmorey covered my point. -
So what should be the rule? I think if gou try to make one, it won't be easy. Should all authors agree?
-
when you report methods you didn't follow youwill probably fall within any rule the journal/communities come up with
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
