Maybe in physics if experiment had error. COPE guidelines clearly don't match with a retraction.
-
-
p-hacking is wrong.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
One thing if conclusions end up wrong. Seems like another if the *evidence* in paper is misrepresented (by e.g. p hacking)
-
So a correction would be more appropriate. But can't solve p-hacking in retrospect, regrettably.
-
Doesn't p hacking constitute an "honest error" & author saying they p hacked is "clear evidence"? http://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines.pdf …
-
They mention miscalculations. Not an alpha inflated to unknown extent. If effect is true, there is no Type 1 error.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
