Shouldn't the paper be retracted?
https://twitter.com/chrisdc77/status/780460211932921856 …
-
-
Replying to @o_guest
@chrisdc77 also, how did a N= 42 with 5 exclusions paper ever get past peer review?1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @PaulGowder @o_guest
B/c getting pub'd in the flashiest psych journals requires flashy results, & less-so robust methods. This is changing.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Replying to @chrisdc77 @PaulGowder
I really hope for the best and not just another local minimum. 
4:34 PM - 26 Sep 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.