Hard to know where to draw the line. Big issue for the field that is going to get bigger.
-
-
-
it feels wrong for the line to be repent and we'll love you, or is it just me?
-
Me too. But I'm also a pragmatist & we need to start somewhere. At present, there is no incentive to ever admit p-hacking.
-
An encouraging response now may encourage others to come forward, which combined w/ raising standards will improve our science.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@chrisdc77 also, how did a N= 42 with 5 exclusions paper ever get past peer review? -
B/c getting pub'd in the flashiest psych journals requires flashy results, & less-so robust methods. This is changing.
-
I really hope for the best and not just another local minimum.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
