I hereby dare everyone to preregister at least one study in the next year. Just go for it! You might be pleasantly surprised.
-
-
Replying to @neuroconscience
If peer-reviewed preregistration is too much work, just drop a form at the
@OSFramework. Easy-peasy!2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @neuroconscience @OSFramework
easy but not convinced it makes sense for modelling
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @OSFramework
why is that? Most computational studies start with extremely well defined hypotheses.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @neuroconscience @OSFramework
you could preregister the empirical data you want to model I guess. But my modelling has been replications in
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
the past. still writing some up. How would prereg in that case help?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
modelling is a hypo building exercise normally you preregister a finished hypothesis was my understanding
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I've never done modelling in the way you describe though, care to elaborate? could have misunderstood anyway.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @OSFramework
most of what we do at WTCN (RL, RPE, PC) involves model comparison between a priori computational hypotheses
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
that's great but not what I've been doing, perhaps I'll get to work in a lab that does that. 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.