Yup. We only use that term to distinguish (semantically) the pre vs post RR stages
-
-
Replying to @chrisdc77 @nunezanalyzed and
We should come up with clearer terminology on that sort of thing.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sampendu @nunezanalyzed and
Yeah I guess we could replace "pilot" with "preliminary" to avoid this.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chrisdc77 @sampendu and
Many small N for hypothesis gen useless without RR confirmatory after hypothesis gen
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nunezanalyzed @chrisdc77 and
I'm just assuming this is not an optimal strategy for findings true hypotheses
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sampendu @nunezanalyzed and
Because this is effectively what current literature is like in general :P
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @sampendu @chrisdc77 and
Yes, but without RR confirmatory research, which is necessary
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nunezanalyzed @chrisdc77 and
The RR is the RPP & RRRs we hear about so much these days. Doesn't look good...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sampendu @chrisdc77 and
Two many Rs and Ps, I was thinking registered reports, RR. I guess I meant PRR?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @nunezanalyzed @sampendu and
so many acronyms!
I get lost so easily. Is there a lexicon or something? Maybe2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
even a wiki?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.