Neat idea, but the problem is that this is not actually the case http://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/09/the-inevitable-evolution-of-bad-science/500609/ …pic.twitter.com/rbn6DXd5Uy
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
There is definitely a Type II (false negative) and Type I (false positive) trade-off.
Existing publication model heavily biased to Type I error. New publication model?
Solution: separate exploratory & confirmatory research. Do not bias publication acceptance
agree, cf. registered reports by @chrisdc77
Worry is that ONLY confirm research published in future, leading to Type II bias
I think that's an entirely unnecessary worry, but happy to revise my views based on data!
Anyone who worries about this is invited to enjoy the long sections describing exploratory >
> analyses in our first six RRs at Cortexhttp://www.journals.elsevier.com/cortex/virtual-special-issues/virtual-special-issue-registered-reports …
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.