I think you might have it a bit backwards...the title designates the fact that you earned it. It's like a battle scar.
-
-
or assuming that because I disagree with Dr-by-default, I must be in it merely for curiosity?
-
nothing to do with Dr. You said hierarchical - and academia is very hierarchical by definition
-
the world is
-
what you said is not a reason not to do science. Because if somebody wants to enact a revolution in
-
the way we do things in science they are more than welcome! Your logic would mean that no women
-
should do science because there's not many women. The status quo should not be a reason for more
-
status quo. Anti hierarchy in science is welcome!



-
as are all genders, gender variant people, transgender people, women, we need you because currently
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I'm actually genuinely shocked at that.
-
there are many great reasons to dissuade people from doing PhDs... lack of jobs being the main one
-
context was not this
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
