Indeed. If you don't value the IF, stick to preprints. If you can't afford that, the IF has value (albeit irrational).
-
-
Replying to @Villavelius
I assume
@froggleston wants to reduce its present real value via systemic change. But revolutionary action may alter this.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @froggleston
I'm all for systemic change, but too many parties have to agree. Preprints can be a systemic bypass. I hope.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Villavelius @froggleston
some that I see are so terrible though like not even proof read
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @froggleston
Have you looked at many formally published journal articles recently? :-)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
why do ppl keep thinking I don't read... Somebody (not saying but boss) asked me if know the journal
@cogsci_soc
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I read articles in journals, yes. Preprints are almost always predictably unreadable and wrong in certain areas.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @froggleston
You must be very unlucky with preprints. In my experience there's little difference with formally published stuff.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I don't believe in luck. I sample and I deduce. 
-
-
many in my area feel the same 2 so there's that as well. Preprints are amazing. I did 1 recently. But not enough.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
