Nothing wrong with the impact factor as long as it isn't a hindrance to free and timely flow of scientific research results, I should think.
I read articles in journals, yes. Preprints are almost always predictably unreadable and wrong in certain areas.
-
-
You must be very unlucky with preprints. In my experience there's little difference with formally published stuff.
-
maybe in your area? In mine: no.
-
I don't believe in luck. I sample and I deduce.

-
many in my area feel the same 2 so there's that as well. Preprints are amazing. I did 1 recently. But not enough.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I think this is where editorial obviously has value and is an important part of sci comms. Preeps are flag planting.
-
yeponomics
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.


