this is as true for altmetrics too tho no?
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @Villavelius
No means perfect, but attempt to measure the article. IF is a journal fudge based on cherry picked data you never see
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @froggleston @Villavelius
100% I accept but think it can be just as biased, eg sexist racist, high for reasons not scientific. And...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I really wish this was discussed more. Mentioned same to
@Protohedgehog recently so maybe other think same?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @froggleston and
like I'm genuinely dying to see what ppl are thinking if they are anything regarding this.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
As
@HigginsDes said [paraphrased] at@ISMBinfo, "you can't distil a researcher's value to an integer".3 replies 3 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @froggleston @o_guest and
real or complex, then? /me ducks and runs
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @froggleston @o_guest and
I dunno about that... the odd negative here and there maybe ;)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
haha @drjtwit argand diagrams for science!
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @froggleston and
I sense the triumphant return of the K-index,
@neilhall_uk2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

