I actually meant that I don't think we can draw conclusions about the recognition of the 300 ppl from this survey by itself
-
-
Replying to @danielskatz @kyleniemeyer
the data needs to be broken down more and compared to interview data. Hides freq of citation in current analysis.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @npch @kyleniemeyer
exactly what I was thinking, both in what is hidden and the need for a subset of interviews
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @danielskatz @kyleniemeyer
as Olivier noted, still very preliminary analysis. But we're confident about the data.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I could only spot desc stats when I skimmed paper. Any further analyses? Inferrential stats are useful.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Not yet - fancy collaborating? ;-)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
sure, although I'm at
@PyConUK and just moved back to London! What's the plan for analysis at the moment?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Olivier conducting interviews at
@ResearchSoftEng conf this week, then next round of analysis1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @npch @danielskatz and
consisting of? What tests are you planning?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @danielskatz
That’s a question to direct to Olivier, who can answer much better than I! I’ll do an email…
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
