Wolfe sounds ridiculous.https://twitter.com/sjriches/status/774893705589301248 …
-
-
Replying to @PhiloNatural
@sjriches@guardian@bilingualsolver chomsky IS ridiculous though http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/evidence-rebuts-chomsky-s-theory-of-language-learning/?WT.mc_id=SA_TW_MB_FEAT …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
Big difference between Wolfe on Darwin and Chomsky & this article (which I'm unsure about).
@sjriches@guardian@bilingualsolver1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @PhiloNatural @sjriches and
you're unsure that chomsky is wrong about language!? This has been know for a while
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @PhiloNatural and
I like both articles but nothing too new in there. Most academics in my area know this.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
Are there any papers you could link me?
@sjriches@guardian@bilingualsolver2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
here's something by @deevybee http://deevybee.blogspot.co.uk/2012/09/what-chomsky-didnt-get-about-child.html?m=1 …
-
-
Replying to @o_guest
Thank you! I'll read it tonight.
@sjriches@guardian@bilingualsolver@deevybee0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.