neuro/cog sci theory o'course.
-
-
-
Replying to @o_guest
like so phil of sci has loads of ways of defining "theory" and of "testing". Hence why I asked if you are lakatosian.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @o_guest
I assumed you meant a software to check theory papers in psych like statcheck for experimental psych papers (2/3)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mtraghavan @o_guest
apologies! As for phil theory schools, I suspect most psych/neuro papers would obey a Popperian framework (3/3)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mtraghavan
yeah not sure about that. Might be cool idea to check.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
i suspect if you polled a ton of scientists, they would like to think science moves by conjecture and refutation
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @o_guest
I personally am partial to wesley salmons views on philosophy of science, and as for stat phil, its Deborah Mayo 4 life.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
-
-
I take it you're not a fan?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.