also just to be clear I'm not a Bayesian myself, but not anti Bayesian either.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @talyarkoni and
I don't do anyth Bayesian. I obviously can't rule it out for future work, but I haven't.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @talyarkoni and
Now I'm really intrigued. If you're not doing anything frequentist or Bayesian, what >
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisdc77 @o_guest and
< analytic methods do you apply for the part of your modelling that (as discussed above) >
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisdc77 @o_guest and
< you consider to be deductive hypothesis testing?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chrisdc77 @talyarkoni and
ok this is too hard for twitter and I wanna drink.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @chrisdc77 and
I've done modelling that can be seen as deductive due to maths. And modelling in which...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @chrisdc77 and
the empirical data is evaluated using stats.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @chrisdc77 and
tangent but often model fit is evaluated using bs and/or qualitative fit.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @chrisdc77 and
qualitative I guess can be ok sometimes...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
but if I'm replicating and it doesn't replicate there's no point running any test for ex
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.