hence why you publish the specificatiom
also just to be clear I'm not a Bayesian myself, but not anti Bayesian either.
-
-
I don't do anyth Bayesian. I obviously can't rule it out for future work, but I haven't.
-
Now I'm really intrigued. If you're not doing anything frequentist or Bayesian, what >
-
< analytic methods do you apply for the part of your modelling that (as discussed above) >
-
< you consider to be deductive hypothesis testing?
-
ok this is too hard for twitter and I wanna drink.

-
I've done modelling that can be seen as deductive due to maths. And modelling in which...
-
the empirical data is evaluated using stats.
-
tangent but often model fit is evaluated using bs and/or qualitative fit.

- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.