People don't like change, especially when they've spent XX years having success the old way.
-
-
Replying to @sTeamTraen
Yeah, I expect general reluctance to change is always an obstacle. But I want to know if there's something beyond that.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @annemscheel @sTeamTraen
the need to be right? can't change hyp to be consistent with data if pre-reg
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @_a_c__ @sTeamTraen
Yep, I suspect that too. It means you must become an *actual* good researcher and construct good hypotheses.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @annemscheel @sTeamTraen
On the other hand, pre-reg plus adequate power means that negative results should be meaningful and important too.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @annemscheel @sTeamTraen
yes of course. But meaningful and important doesn't mean *I* was right.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @_a_c__ @sTeamTraen
Absolutely. I generally think we need to learn to keep our egos out of our research as much as possible.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @annemscheel
That's of course true, but unfortunately science is conducted by humans, many of them with mortgages.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @sTeamTraen
I'd even go further: Identifying with your research is the only way to ramp up all the needed motivation. Still >
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @annemscheel @sTeamTraen
I think a little differentiation between your self-esteem and your results would go a very long way...
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
I think it's hard although by no means impossible to identify with research and not involve one's ego. 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.