6/ These are often just repetitions of same arg's or a form of bargaining where a sceptic poses increasingly specific/unlikely cases as args
-
-
so it's kinda like Poppers use: test with a highly probability of detecting genuine effects but not non genuine
-
link me! Sounds like some phil of sci I'd be interested in reading about - I'm not a Popperian though.
-
will do, just having dinner

-
food is for the week
also thanks - I await with eagerness. -
well the pain book is 'Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge', though there's a new one coming out >
-
then there's the blog over at https://errorstatistics.com/ . And this paper is a very nice summary http://www.phil.vt.edu/dmayo/personal_website/Error_Statistics_2011.pdf …
-
she is on the tweets too
@learnfromerror -
I know but I am too embarrassed to tag someone when saying 'their book is awesome' :')
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.