I don't object. Empirical people can do anything they like.
it's part of a school of thought just like anyth is. There's no single scientific method http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-method/ …
-
-
also a model's specification is not known until after you have done all the work!
-
Curious to know whether you would consider the work you do "hypothesis testing" in a deductive sense.
-
I do modelling that fits into that and modelling that doesn't
-
Do you use p values to draw inferences in your work?
-
I have not done a frequentist test on a model as far as I can recall
-
Bayesian statistics are only immune to overfitting you have the correct model and priors
-
also just to be clear I'm not a Bayesian myself, but not anti Bayesian either.
-
I don't do anyth Bayesian. I obviously can't rule it out for future work, but I haven't.
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.