2/ Many people voice worries and objections about pre-reg, eg. here: http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/publications/observer/2016/sept-16/why-preregistration-makes-me-nervous.html …
-
-
prereg = a philosophical position just like anything and the phil of sci needs to be thought out for it just like with anything
-
severe testing of hypotheses with or without pre reg can actually achieve a lot of what we want. But ppl won't do it
-
severity in the Mayo sense
-
what does Mayo mean in this context?
-
so it's kinda like Poppers use: test with a highly probability of detecting genuine effects but not non genuine
-
link me! Sounds like some phil of sci I'd be interested in reading about - I'm not a Popperian though.
-
will do, just having dinner

-
food is for the week
also thanks - I await with eagerness. - 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.