4/ multiple times by diff people in comments, blog posts, editorials. See eg. comments to above-mentioned article or http://www.russpoldrack.org/2016/09/why-preregistration-no-longer-makes-me.html …
-
-
Replying to @annemscheel
5/ In Twitter/FB discussions it often seems to me as if sceptics either don't read these replies/explanations or just discard them.
1 reply 3 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @annemscheel
6/ These are often just repetitions of same arg's or a form of bargaining where a sceptic poses increasingly specific/unlikely cases as args
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @annemscheel
7/ I'm puzzled why so many seem so reluctant to change their minds. What am I missing?
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @annemscheel
8/ What is so scary about "preregister everything" *in light of all myth debunking* that has taken place?
3 replies 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @annemscheel
9/ Please tell me. I honestly want to see the other side. /end
5 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
-
Replying to @o_guest
I disagree, but maybe you can elaborate. In my view, pre-reg is crucial for hypothesis testing, be it frequentist or Bayesian.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @annemscheel
@Darren_Rhodes might enjoy going through it, I'm not actually against others doing preregistration. But I can't see me doing it2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @Darren_Rhodes
Ok - I'd be really interested in your specific objections though.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I don't object. Empirical people can do anything they like.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @Darren_Rhodes
Right... realising my "preregister everything" should actually be "preregister everything empirical".
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 26 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.