[Tweetstorm ahead] 1/n The "debate" about pre-registration is a great example for how hard it is to change people's pre-formed opinions.
-
-
I disagree, but maybe you can elaborate. In my view, pre-reg is crucial for hypothesis testing, be it frequentist or Bayesian.
-
@Darren_Rhodes might enjoy going through it, I'm not actually against others doing preregistration. But I can't see me doing it -
Ok - I'd be really interested in your specific objections though.
-
I don't object. Empirical people can do anything they like.
-
Right... realising my "preregister everything" should actually be "preregister everything empirical".
-
well, I'm not sure about other modellers ofc. Everybody has their own perspective. I doubt they disagree tho.
-
with modelling reproduction and reimplementation is v important with respect to theory/validation etc
-
In principal I stand by "pre-reg everything", but if you're not collecting new data, it's a promise no-one can check
- 23 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.