so many issues 2 disagree w & unpack here. lemme just say I don't code nor do science 4 rewards b they pubs or twitter attention.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @AnneEUrai
I know u mean well, but I think too much here = disagreeable to me. That post is not really close to my views at all on open sci!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
maybe important diff is coding ability? as a non-compsci (self-taught) programmer, preparing code to go public for my first project
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AnneEUrai @o_guest
i do sometimes feel reluctant&scared to do so: want my code to be open, but know it would be less future work, safer not to share.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AnneEUrai @o_guest
trying to articulate what i think many feel are obstacles to an ideal world where we all code openly... so barriers should be low
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AnneEUrai
a lot of us do code openly. there is a mistake here in thinking anybody actually looks at our code though LOL
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @AnneEUrai
few read our papers - few look at our code let alone run it!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @AnneEUrai
if anyone ever does run mine, don't know if ill be ecstatic or scared shitless (prob both)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AnneEUrai
if I was you I'd be chuffed to bits. One things I really like is people finding my bugs for me. Or typos! Preprints are fun too.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
chuffed if bug doesnt change conclusion - this haunts me http://www.jneurosci.org/content/35/6/2838.full … (some1 else got code and found missing transpose)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
that's science being self-correcting though (which it usually is not) so I guess overall happy-making
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.