.@o_guest @biocrusoe because increasingly reviewers require them to make it open source in order to publish...
-
-
I know u mean well, but I think too much here = disagreeable to me. That post is not really close to my views at all on open sci!
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Many academics code to get their research done/published; that is whole point of coding in 1st place for them.
-
academics like myself actually see code as the exp - I assume
@AnneEUrai u also? Here eg everything is code:https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/768354838627450880 …
-
like literally the whole point is the code itself, without it there is no data, no model, no paper.
-
the code IS the research
-
as an experimentalist, code necessary not sufficient - code to pull out what's there in the data, only part of the sci
-
fair enough so in your case you should be less worried even than me with sharing code (not that I am)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
