When deciding between similar libraries on github: I'll choose the 1 that listens to me & my issues, allows me to contribute, & is not rude.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest
Disagreeable open source developers who are also academics are the worst - why make it open source if you don't want users/contributions?
7 replies 7 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
.
@o_guest@biocrusoe because increasingly reviewers require them to make it open source in order to publish...3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
(I don't see any way to require that someone support their software, nor should we. We should just not use it.)
4 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
We should be appreciative all sharing. It takes resources whether it is funded or self-funded.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
I'm appreciative, but I'll prefer those who r willing to explain their code and allow my contribution
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
*nod* Most will luv input and contribution. Make at least 3 contacts. Blog and/or fork to share yours.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Yep, most do. I posted some before. Some you can see as my contributions on my github profile.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @CheeHongWong and
I find this line of expectation distressing...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
no expectation at all. reread my first tweet. it's a heuristic. we all use them when deciding.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.