I'm just glad to be back with my all time fav thing Rmarkdown :')
-
-
Replying to @ed_berry
I'm not actually an R person. But it's a real language. I do use markdown esp for github and my website.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
it's my fav for papers and reproducibility. I'll never copy and paste a result again
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ed_berry
markdown is so useful. http://oliviaguest.com is mostly written in markdown (and then compiled obviously)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
it's funny how people use the term reproducibility... *wink wink*https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/770285269828440064?s=09 …
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @ed_berry
I don't believe there is a wrong way! I'm no prescriptivist!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I just linked that because I wrote it and it came out yesterday.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
I'm reading it now. I find the point about not needing original code interesting. I've heard people say w/r/t analyses that >
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
> reproducibility is all about being able to take someone's code and get the same result. I prefer your definition, though.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
well that definition is out there just not applicable (imho) to computational modelling since for us the model is the experiment
-
-
Replying to @o_guest
True. For experimental stuff the data and the description of the analysis in the paper should be sufficient, imo.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - 12 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

