all the people who can only code in Matlab are not really programmers, sorry but I believe this 
-
-
I just linked that because I wrote it and it came out yesterday.

-
I'm reading it now. I find the point about not needing original code interesting. I've heard people say w/r/t analyses that >
-
> reproducibility is all about being able to take someone's code and get the same result. I prefer your definition, though.
-
well that definition is out there just not applicable (imho) to computational modelling since for us the model is the experiment
-
True. For experimental stuff the data and the description of the analysis in the paper should be sufficient, imo.
-
There is definitely too much incomplete description of analyses going round
-
again imho I don't think that's the crux but it's important of course. If an effect exists it should exist regardless of analysis
-
super tired, will crash, but I've a paper (2nd author) that covers my views regarding models and why they need to be rewritten
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.




