.@biotweeps seems to be against invasive methods (opto, canula)--scicomm important, but can't agree w/ this approachhttps://twitter.com/biotweeps/status/770282283395866624 …
-
-
Replying to @cMadan @biotweeps
Yeah, this is bad and they should feel bad.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @alie_astrocyte
yep *sigh*
@alie_astrocyte@cMadan@biotweeps they are JAQing off. A pretty lowbrow tactic: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Just_asking_questions …3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
[Admin] Adnan is being given the opportunity to address the issues. I've removed a number of tweets.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
not sure if removal was the correct course of action as it makes people's remarks look context-less...
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @biotweeps and
also letting him address what? surely that's is his own decision on his own private account regardless?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @biotweeps and
if his views and yours don't overlap - then why keep going?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
[Admin] His email suggests he wants to redress the balance. I'm giving him the opportunity.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Seems fair then. But I still can't be sure what I would do - good luck though!
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
[Admin] For context, I've a lab animal license & understand the outrage. I'm feeling my way, here.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
I think a good rule is no anti-science/pro-antivivisectionist dog whistles should be posted.
-
-
I feel like I missed something, or just don't follow the wording... do you mean 'whistleblower'?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
[Admin] I absolutely agree and have made that clear. I'll be monitoring things closely.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.