thanks for including the link, I didn't know that term
-
-
that being said I don't actually think that link is the best article or indeed website - haha
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
no worries, was sufficient for getting the idea across
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
it's good for knowing who is completely anti-science and/or eugenicist but many fine points totally lost
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
mentioned eugenics because of http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Emil_O._W._Kirkegaard …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @alie_astrocyte
yes, I have came across his tweets awhile ago (because of the OKCupid data release)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @o_guest
advent of ability to easily create 'journals' has created predatory journals, but also others where peer-review no longer functions
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
and without some sort of standards, these dilute the rest of academic work to those who aren't trained to discern the difference
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
these perspectives aren't new, but before it was easier to separate them from real science
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I dunno social media and internet broadly makes it easier not harder imho e.g., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Fisher#Eugenicist …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.