.@biotweeps seems to be against invasive methods (opto, canula)--scicomm important, but can't agree w/ this approachhttps://twitter.com/biotweeps/status/770282283395866624 …
-
-
Replying to @cMadan @biotweeps
Yeah, this is bad and they should feel bad.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @alie_astrocyte
yep *sigh*
@alie_astrocyte@cMadan@biotweeps they are JAQing off. A pretty lowbrow tactic: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Just_asking_questions …3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
thanks for including the link, I didn't know that term
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
that being said I don't actually think that link is the best article or indeed website - haha
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
no worries, was sufficient for getting the idea across
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
it's good for knowing who is completely anti-science and/or eugenicist but many fine points totally lost
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
mentioned eugenics because of http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Emil_O._W._Kirkegaard …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @alie_astrocyte
yes, I have came across his tweets awhile ago (because of the OKCupid data release)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Replying to @o_guest
advent of ability to easily create 'journals' has created predatory journals, but also others where peer-review no longer functions
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.