.@biotweeps seems to be against invasive methods (opto, canula)--scicomm important, but can't agree w/ this approachhttps://twitter.com/biotweeps/status/770282283395866624 …
-
-
mentioned eugenics because of http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Emil_O._W._Kirkegaard …
-
yes, I have came across his tweets awhile ago (because of the OKCupid data release)
-
gross huh
-
advent of ability to easily create 'journals' has created predatory journals, but also others where peer-review no longer functions
-
and without some sort of standards, these dilute the rest of academic work to those who aren't trained to discern the difference
-
these perspectives aren't new, but before it was easier to separate them from real science
-
I dunno social media and internet broadly makes it easier not harder imho e.g., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Fisher#Eugenicist …
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.