What the Success of Brain Imaging Implies about the Neural Code - this looks pretty awesome http://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/08/23/071076.abstract … @DrLoveBC @o_guest
-
-
neat, but why only focus on subvoxels? a non-smooth but very low-freq signal wd also show up with fMRI, no?
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @talyarkoni @russpoldrack and
also, parsimony is a v. weak constraint here. even if some signal is smooth, plenty is probably non-smooth
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
if I understand correctly, you mean plenty in the brain is most definitely not smooth? Yes. I agree 1/2
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I left a comment on biorxiv that will hopefully show up soon. but briefly—I think it’s inaccurate to say 1/
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Thanks Tal, this is helpful. I replied on biorxiv but it's still in limbo waiting for approval.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
thanks! I replied again, but also in limbo. kind of silly they have to approve comments from repeat posters
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I'm pretty sure
@biorxivpreprint could/should change that setting in their@disqus profile *hint hint*1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Ok I think all visible now! @talyarkoni @DrLoveBC @russpoldrack http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/08/24/071076 …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.