that results show that some neural codes are implausible. they provide pos. evidence for _one_ scheme. 2/
-
-
Replying to @talyarkoni @o_guest and
but as you acknowledge, we _know_ there are other neural codes all over the place. 3/
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @talyarkoni @o_guest and
and conclusion that “neural code must be smooth” at subvox isn’t true—it could be supravoxel non smooth
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @talyarkoni @o_guest and
that said, was a great read. particularly like the point about abstract reps being (possibly) non-imageable
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
I am really thankful for feedback and it will be used to improve paper, clarity, argument, etc.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
I have a few more specific comments about points in intro, will try to leave them ASAP on biorxiv
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Oh wow - thanks so much for that. Sharing this manuscript as a preprint has really paid off.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
I just posted some comments on BioRXiv - nowhere near as thoughtful as Tal's (as usual), but hopefully useful
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Thanks again! Might have to wait till weekend to properly read, but will def use 2 improve manuscript.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @russpoldrack and
Review process done (comms in biorxiv), Eds should convince you to send the paper to their Js.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Thx for that. I'm gonna go over all of them later on - I'm @ a conf. But thx so much! 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.